By
Nick Myers
Big-up to England for getting through to the Euros
semi-finals for the first time in 25 years, and in epic style with four goals
against Ukraine.
This is a team that is scoring goals in more ways
than one, however. With a squad that features a wealth of incredible black
talent – Raheem Stirling, Marcus Rashford, Jude Bellingham, Bukayo Saka to name
a few – this team has openly stood against racism since the tournament began.
(And despite receiving upward of 2000 abusive tweets.) It’s ironic to think
that the team that was originally booed for taking the knee could soon be
lifting the Henri Delaunay Cup.
But, as I watched the recent games, it struck me how
teams like England and France have tonnes of black players on the pitch – but
few, if any, black managers. In fact, if I hadn’t read at the weekend that
Patrick Vieira was Crystal Palace’s new manager, I wouldn’t be able to name a
single black Premier League manager. Could you?
How is it that the world of football talks up a
strong commitment to diversity and an actively anti-racist stance – and yet we
rarely see this black talent make it through to senior positions?
As always, it’s a lesson for our industry. We can’t
have black talent coming in through initiatives like BRiM and yet never
breaking through to the upper tier. The recent AA, IPA, and ISBA-led "All
In" census supports this point. It found that while ethnic minorities
represent 24% of new recruits, just 1% of the C-suite is black.
Black
recruits are already walking off the pitch
What’s even more alarming is that 32% of black
talent is considering leaving the industry altogether because they don’t feel
included. I assumed this was because our sector has a higher percentage of
privately educated white people, to whom black working-class people, like me,
found it hard to relate. (When I joined our industry, it was like stepping onto
another planet; I knew nothing of ski season, or round-the-world gap year
adventures. Heck I just wanted to get a job and start earning.)
It turns out that my assumption was wrong. Our
industry’s take on diversity has been middle-class white people recruiting
middle-class black people: 70% of black talent went to an independent school,
according to the IPA’s BLM Audit. So, even when white, private-school elites
recruit black, private-school elites there’s a struggle. What hope, then, for
the 30% of black entrants who went to the local comp? And why is it that black
talent, regardless of social class, feels less welcome?
A
different league
We can’t leave inclusion, representation and
belonging to chance. Not in football, and definitely not in life. As
demonstrated by Singapore, which punches well above its weight in terms of GDP,
innovation and tech. Key to its commercial creativity and performance has been
diversity.
According to the World Economic Forum, in 1965
Singapore decided not to leave racial harmony to chance and intentionally
worked to create a society that broke ethnic ghettos, setting hard KPIs to be
more diverse. At Oliver, we’re also not leaving diversity to chance.
Our founder, Simon Martin, has actively put targets
in place at all levels across Oliver and the Inside Ideas Group. It’s massively
helped us move the needle on things, without sacrificing the quality of our
recruitment or appointments. This was a fear of mine initially, as no black
employee wants to feel like the "token talent". Or worse, some sort
of charity case being "helped". All agency leaders should pay attention
to that last part, as it can be a fine line.
Keeping
and harnessing capable black talent requires a better game plan
So, what can we do to make the 32% of black talent
thinking of leaving the industry feel like this is their home pitch? Here are five
things I think might help:
Move from mentorship to sponsorship. We must move
from providing "mentors" to providing senior-level
"sponsorship" that will advocate for black talent around the
boardroom.
Get more of each player on the pitch. Create a more
inclusive culture that allows people to bring their whole self to work, because
if someone leaves 50% of themselves at home, they’re already halfway out the
door.
Turn players into managers sooner. Implicit bias
means managers are more likely to delay putting black talent forward, this can
be overcome by promoting earlier. In fact, I fear that promoting black talent
could be even more problematic for black managers, due to fears about how
promoting black talent might be perceived.
Get talent in through the doors and the roof. The
32% of black talent thinking of leaving need to see that success is possible
for people like them. This requires lateral thinking, such as a client-side or
international hire. Whichever way it’s done, it’s incredibly empowering to see
someone like yourself in such a role. Diverse Boards was set up by Dino
Myers-Lamptey to help organisations get talent in through the roof.
Set a goal and keep score. Targets shouldn’t be
needed when it comes to becoming more diverse. But, as we’ve seen with making
boards less male dominated, they do work.
Every talented black recruit that leaves our
industry is an own goal.
Fact:
representation is good for the bottom line.
Boston Consulting Group found that diverse
management teams generate 19% more revenue through innovation. McKinsey
similarly found that diverse organisations outperform rivals by 36%.
Getting more black talent through the ranks and into
the C-suite isn’t just kumbaya, it’s a strategic imperative. CEOs reading this
should immediately tie it to their senior team’s remuneration. And, no, I am
not saying this just because I am black. In fact, what is usually the case is
senior black talent are afraid to push the issue of diversity for fear of
drawing attention to their blackness.
In the words of former footballer Fabrice Muamba:
“Does the reflection of black players on the pitch right now reflect the
managers, does it reflect the board, does it reflect people on TV? We have to
be a reflection of our product.”
The same is true for our industry.
Credit:
www.campaignlive.co.uk
Leave your comment.
0 Comments